Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TikGames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:38, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TikGames (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general and company-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Video games, Companies, United States of America, and California. UtherSRG (talk) 14:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:CORPDEPTH fail. Company isn't notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NCORP as stated above. Only found a deprecated/unreliable source. Tails Wx 15:41, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.