Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Garner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Garner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No sign of significant roles in multiple notable productions. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. This article also appears to be a very close paraphrasing of this source so maybe it should be deleted as a copyright violation. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable run-of-the-mill actor. Stage actors get a lot less press than movie or TV actors, especially in small markets. His agent's page[1] suggests he hasn't received wide press attention. He's not originated any significant roles or won any important awards. Although there are published interviews[2], something that's purely a transcribed interview doesn't count for WP:GNG. Presumption must be that he's not out of the ordinary and not the subject of significant critical comment. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.