Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timebus Travel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timebus Travel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable bus company, Been unsourced for 6 years and there's nothing on Google either, Fails GNG. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 22:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at best as my searches also found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 01:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. If it was a bit more substantioal, I would've opposed, but even so, there are a half dozen private hire firms within London that rent out Routemasters and not have an article here. Why should this be any different? Nordic Dragon^talk 12:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Buscruft. No refs, small nn company. Szzuk (talk) 21:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - love the name, but can't find enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.