Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Marschall Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Marschall Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Wikipedia:Notability (politics) proposes that diplomatic notability should be a person who has "received significant coverage in crafting an international agreement or related to a notable diplomatic event. That doesn't appear to be the case here. Article also has one reference which is not third party. Uhooep (talk) 09:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Not sure that being a British diplomat is automatic grounds for notabilit. I have not found reliable sources for the person.--Loewstisch (talk) 09:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Bilateral relations, Armenia, and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Did not find reliable sources for this person. Tried newspapers.com, Jstor, Google, etc. Carpimaps (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete could not find significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 05:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.