Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiptree Residents Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 22:48, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tiptree Residents Association

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no evidence that this organizations meets WP:NCORP, which is the applicable threshold for organizations. The coverage is fleeting and hyper-local. We don't even have an article for the council on which the only successful candidates from this group served. The only source currently in the article is from a different political party, and offers nothing more than a passing mention. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Politics. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:24, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 23:17, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: How and why was this page made? Notablen't. Moritoriko (talk) 06:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is one of the least notable pages I have seen. There are no RSes and if every single group/association ever was given its own page, it would cause a page glut. If we can find more sources for it, that is a different story but for now, this is not worth keeping. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant coverage. Frank Ken (talk) 09:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - they basically did one thing 43 years ago. Bearian (talk) 21:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The Tiptree Residents Association lacks sufficient independent, reliable coverage to meet Wikipedia's notability standards for organizations. While it has participated in local elections. This involvement alone does not establish notability without significant coverage in reliable sources. The existing references are limited and do not provide detailed information about the organization's activities or impact. The article's content is minimal and does not offer substantial information beyond basic election participation. Without more comprehensive sources detailing the organization's history and achievements, it does not meet the criteria for a standalone Wikipedia article. Unclasp4940 (talk) 03:28, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Vanamonde. Fails WP:NCORP. Iljhgtn (talk) 21:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.