Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toby James

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 18:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toby James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any real notability. Slatersteven (talk) 14:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Reviews of his books in multiple reliable sources: Elite Statecraft and Election Administration ([1][2][3]), British Labour Leaders ([4][5][6]), British Conservative Leaders ([7][8][9]). And ~500 citations is probably a borderline pass of WP:PROF#C1 in a field like political science. – Joe (talk) 15:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Joe. ∯WBG^converse 07:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep on account of the multiple book reviews in reliable sources. Uhooep (talk) 04:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.