Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tod Strike

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and without prejudice to a future renomination. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:04, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tod Strike (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear indepedently notable from The Ten Tenors. Some coverage as an individual in theatre websites, but not enough significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Boneymau (talk) 22:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 22:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 22:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 22:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Seems to have enough independent, reliable coverage to meet GNG. Merge wouldn't be appropriate given the number of members in the Ten Tenors. He has a Cairns Post article on him from 2001 and a Courier Mail/Herald Sun article on him from 2004, among others. Also has numerous interviews and profiles separate from his Tenors role on various independent, albeit niche, sources online. Kb.au (talk) 01:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to The Ten Tenors. Not enough to justify an independent article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Lacks significant coverage for a WP:BLP. The article states, "best known as being one of the original members of "The Ten Tenors" (minor one time wonder), and there are 46 other "former" members. The 24 word (prose) article will just remain a poorly sourced carrer stub. PLEASE do not merge. This often results in a blue link. The reasoning is that someone will want to "blue link all 57 names (ten current but that changes) and the band members that will be BLP links just linking back to the The Ten Tenors article that is an on-going issue on other articles. There is not enough notability per reliable sources for this subject. Otr500 (talk) 13:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.