Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toomer's Corner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vague rationale, countered by both keep voters (non-admin closure) NemesisAT (talk) 19:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Toomer's Corner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of encyclopedic notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Even if you expand your bare and thin reason for deletion, the corner is very notable in Auburn and SEC lore as a common campus meeting point for celebrations and everyday things. There's entire documentaries devoted to it, including one about its trees being killed and poisoned. This might be a case where an article can be oversourced for its WP:N. Nate • (chatter) 01:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Alabama. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. There are 19 references in the article. There are tens of thousands of sources available online. Meets WP:GNG, quite easily. Nomination rationale of "lack of encyclopedic notability" sounds like WP:IDONTLIKEIT, rather than a valid deletion rationale. Jacona (talk) 11:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.