Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odgerel Ereenkhuu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Odgerel Ereenkhuu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NMODEL fail. Poorly written. No RSes (pinetrest is not a RS) except for IMDB ([1]). BEFORE doesn't show much. CSD G4 rejected per WP:SOFTDELETE, through previously G4ed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Model Odgerel and deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odgerel (Top Model). Icewhiz (talk) 08:29, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. This may qualify for speedy delete, as the previous debate ended in speedy delete vote... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:46, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
declined - [2] (explanation here - [3]) - I can see how this fails the CSD criteria, though I doubt this will survive AfD unless there are Mongolian language sources I'm missing (and I did try searching for them in a BEFORE - with the rendering given in the article - though as a non-Mongolian speaker I may have missed something).Icewhiz (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article lacks even one reliable source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.