Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tormenta (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:46, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tormenta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this fictional location (game setting) passes NFICTION/GNG. Prior AfD from 2008 closed as keep with WP:GOOGLEHITS argumen. Sigh. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 21:53, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 21:53, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 21:53, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 21:53, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - It was deemed notable in the previous AfD and has a comprehensive, well-referenced article in the Portuguese Wikipedia. I do not speak Portuguese, but it appears to meet WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:12, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Marcelo Cassaro as seemingly the only relevant existing article. Just looking at the Portuguese article even without understanding it, I'm not sure I'd call it comprehensive. The only section filled out is "History," which is rarely going to help anything meet the threshold of notability. TTN (talk) 12:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The Portuguese wiki article and WP:WORLDVIEW convince me that this is notable (enough) to be covered, with "The campaign was the largest in Brazil in all categories, breaking all collection records". – sgeureka ^t•c 08:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I have rewritten the article using material from the Portuguese Wikipedia (and a big assist from Google Translate). There are now 14 various sources, I believe this now denotes notability. Guinness323 (talk) 08:28, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep notable role-playing game. Wm335td (talk) 22:26, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw. Improved. Probably on the right side of borderline now. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 22:35, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.