Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tour security

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 12:50, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tour security (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and tagged for notability for the last decade. Mccapra (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom. and Wikipedia is not a dictionary Graywalls (talk) 08:00, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 09:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 09:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 09:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Just unsourced/OR material. Nothing to retain. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:41, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The article may be unsourced, but it does not say anything terribly controversial and is more than a dicdef. It plainly is sourcable with entire books written on the subject, for instance Celebrity Protection and Touring. There is also All Access: The Secrets of Tour Security although self-published, the author, Todd Fox, appears to be well known in the industry and may pass WP:SPS as a recognised expert previously published in the security field, for instance this article in Military Review. SpinningSpark 21:56, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Spinningspark explains the matter well. AfD is not cleanup. Andrew D. (talk) 15:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment well I guess I could post an article on ‘egg-boiling’ or ‘driving at night’ that would not say anything controversial and have sources, but I’m not sure it would be encyclopaedic. Mccapra (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Unsourced for the past decade or so; definition seems to vary quite a lot over the Internet; could probably be much better explained in the context of security services in general... Spyder212 (talk) 19:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.