Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traction Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Traction Labs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buzzstarter for background. DGG ( talk ) 16:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - sources are present, but most are relatively brief trade press mentions or only mention the company quite tangentially. Blythwood (talk) 21:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- I'm seeing some mentions related to Bernie Sander's campaign, but they are rather trivial. Surprisingly, I don't see anything in Google Books -- there's often something company related there. So this may be a case of TOOSOON. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:51, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I meant to comment sooner. All of this is PR as was the other AfD article, there's nothing coming close of the needed substance. SwisterTwister talk 18:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.