Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Train

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was other things. (non-admin closure) —GMX^(ping!) 00:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

This article has been written nearly entirely by User:Trainsandotherthings, who clearly has a COI with the subject. The only solution is to apply WP:TNT and start over fresh. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Thomas & Friends because the article causes nothing but confusion and delay. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Let's just disambiguate it to some other things. MrMeAndMrMe_{Let's talk} 02:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Railroad. It is a content fork. Cullen328 (talk) 02:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Meet a shark underwater, fall and no one will catch her, eat by a lion, run over with a crappy purple Scion. Khemehekis (talk) 05:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to EMD GP35 it is the only prophet in locomotive form. Cutlass^Ciera 12:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, because I like trains. ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 15:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Close per WP:TRAINWRECK. There isn't one yet, but it's going to happen. OcelotCreeper2 (talk) 16:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.