Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TransRomantic Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 07:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TransRomantic Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NWEB and WP:CORP: the current sources are both award listings (#1 from AVN, #2 a sketchy press release on a porn blog). Pornography industry awards are a dime a dozen. I looked for additional sources and found only passing mentions/namedrops/trivial coverage, PR content, and an interview with the company's founder brand's director on a "pornography review" website: nothing to fulfill WP:GNG. Cheers, gnu57 06:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. gnu57 06:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. gnu57 06:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu57 06:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. gnu57 06:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge, to Nica Noelle, unless someone can find out more what is going on with the company, like name change(s), being sold, etc. Not sure why that wasn’t first proposed. Gleeanon409 (talk) 09:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gleeanon409: It appears that TransRomantic Films isn't its own company, but rather one of four product lines that Noelle has directed for AEBN. What content do you think should be merged? The sourcing is terrible and the awards are insignificant; I'd be opposed to adding this material to the article for Noelle. Cheers, gnu57 07:21, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Genericusername57:, as there is very little, I would merge all of it. The sources could easily be improved with better ones, the awards go in its own section. The film itself probably should be talked about a bit more. Gleeanon409 (talk) 07:57, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Nica Noelle. Lack of sources on the company, redirecting and merging to founder is prudent. I dream of Maple (talk) 06:45, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: does not meet WP:NORG / WP:ORGDEPTH. Sufficiently obscure that a redirect is not needed. Nothing to merge, so it's a "delete" for me. --K.e.coffman (talk) 17:02, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As per K.e.coffman. --NL19931993 (talk) 13:11, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - agreed with K.e.coffman. It fails WP:NORG / WP:ORGDEPTH - Jay (talk) 05:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.