Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transfergo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy-delete (G7) (non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 09:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)‎.[reply]

Transfergo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repost + cross-wiki spam, WP:PAID (recently created same pages in different wikis). Was deleted "Article about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". Doesn't look significant. Suspicious but the IP and one user are trying to delete the db-repost template. Кронас (talk) 17:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Lithuania. Shellwood (talk) 19:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: VentureBeat and other funding announcements... Nothing currently in sources in the article we can use. This is the best I could find [1] and it's a contributor post, so not a RS. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 00:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz can you delete it as AfD outcome instead of refundable G7? there is a relevant discussion about this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2024_February_20

WP:G7 was modified and "If an author requests deletion of a page currently undergoing a deletion discussion, the closing admin may interpret that request as agreement with the deletion rationale." text was added as a result of that discussion. Tehonk (talk) 22:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how to accomodate your request unless the article is undeleted and then redeleted and I'm not sure that's an option that I'm up for at the moment but maybe another closer would do this sequence of steps. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.