Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TravelWorm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TravelWorm

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This promotional article has survived since 2007 without anything like reliable independent sourcing. The refs provided are mostly dead and those that remain are interviews and trivia. Does not pass WP:NCORP. Mccapra (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The sources in the article that are still viewable appear to be largely promotional in nature. Searching for additional sources brings up some brief mentions, as the service is still in business, but no kind of coverage that would pass WP:NCORP or the WP:GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 16:14, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.