Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tre Ward

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 06:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tre Ward

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability – I wasn't able to identify even one reliable source covering his achievements; fails WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG. The article was apparently created by this agency for the sole purpose of publicising this young man. If nothing else, this is WP:TOOSOON. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I should make clear that the article was previously longer than it now is, before I removed (a) the copyright violations, (b) the WP:BLP violations and then (c) some unreferenced content. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable; nothing on Google. Fails WP:MUSIC. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 06:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Beemer69. Besides failing WP:GNG, it's also an unreferenced BLP. ^Avic _ennasis @ 17:10, 18 Kislev 5777 / 17:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article lacks sources. No way to validate any claim made in article. ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:49, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.