Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trees Cry for Rain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trees Cry for Rain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film. Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. • IsaacSt (talk) 20:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I couldn't find anything to show notability. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 03:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changed to Keep: Notability has now been found. SL93 (talk) 03:19, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I did a quick search and discovered that this film is actually quite notable per WP:NFILM. Above all, WP:NFO ("screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release"): In 2011, this film was screened at the 15th Annual Seattle Jewish Film Festival, 22 years after its release. Additionally, it was screened at multiple other film festivals, aired on TJC-TV, mentioned in books and the Jewish Folklore and Ethnology Review, and is listed as a resource for students on the Middle East Center @ Penn. I'll gladly add some of the refs I just found to the article. In the meantime, they can be easily googled. -- IsaacSt (talk) 05:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve updated the article, as promised. Even I was surprised from what I was able to find on this film. -- IsaacSt (talk) 10:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, certainly based on the reliable and verifiable sources about the film identified and added to the article by IsaacSt. Alansohn (talk) 21:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Based on the expanded article, the film seems notable. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.