Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tremendum Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tremendum Pictures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Hollywood Reporter article used as a ref doesn't seem to mention Tremendum. I can't find enough WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:NCORP. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Companies, and California. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 08:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello good afternoon because they put the elimination template how can I discuss it Jorse García (talk) 02:24, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I don't see much coverage of the company itself to meet WP:NCORP, which can be tough to meet. Everything I see is mostly a mention that one of their projects is linked to them, nothing about the company. -2pou (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.