Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tren-D

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. Of note is that the keep !vote does not present a valid rationale for article retention per se, as no sources were provided. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tren-D

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This band does not appear to be notable (WP:GNG, WP:BAND). I don't think any of their singles have charted on Gaon Chart, and I couldn't find any reliable English-language sources. The article currently has no references. Korean sources most likely exist, but something beyond press releases or the typical announcement articles is necessary to show notability. Random86 (talk) 06:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 06:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 06:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If "Korean sources most likely exist" let's see some so we can assess notability In ictu oculi (talk) 07:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- When I said Korean sources likely exist, I was referring to the typical press release style articles that are always released by the Korean media. Significant coverage is required to show notability. Random86 (talk) 07:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Absolutely no coverage (even from third party sites like Allkpop/Koreaboo), no significant mentions about them appearing in music shows, nada. Maybe if they promote more and are more well known, then I'll reconsider. Tibbydibby (talk) 20:33, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.