Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrepCamp.org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted and salted by Alex Shih, CSD G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Highstakes00) in violation of ban or block. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TrepCamp.org

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH XFhumu^Talk 21:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 21:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 21:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - hard to tell because all the sources are in Spanish, but running a couple (like #2 and #5) through Google Translate, I'd say the company has significant coverage. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:NOTSPAM and a likely TOU violation. See edit history of the creator [1]. Clear gaming of ACTRIAL, and likely undeclared paid editing sock. Article also has some of the key hallmarks of a commissioned work if you look at its history. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Tony above. jcc (tea and biscuits) 10:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment tagged as G5. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.