Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triibe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:19, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Triibe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Triibe does not exist (any longer!?), website forwards to a Japanese spam advertiser CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - you beat me to the AfD nomination. However, the fact that a product is no longer made is not a cause to delete it from Wikipedia. I would argue the deletion reason is that this is very definitely a non-notable product. A Google search does not suggest this is a product that the world has taken much notice of. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable source exists.Drat8sub (talk) 13:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: nn; found no sigcov. - Flori4nKT A L K 16:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The lack of reliable, secondary sources shows that this product was never notable, and the fact that it appears to now be long defunct means that its highly unlikely it ever will become notable in the future. Rorshacma (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.