Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TripleLift

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:24, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TripleLift

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company operating in a tiny niche market. References seem to be mostly to trade papers. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:39, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Trade publications can be reliable sources. Editors and journalists at trade publications make the same judgement calls about newsworthiness as their counterparts at daily newspapers or broadcast media. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lack of reliable, independent sources. Yes, trade press can be a reliable source and I'd happily lean on it for establishing facts but much less so for notability. I simply don't agree that editors of trade press make 'the same judgement calls about newsworthiness'. Hugsyrup (talk) 08:55, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.