Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tripsane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tripsane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:MUSIC. Unable to find any reliable sources to support notability. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article reads like a puff piece with references to Dat Piff, not reliable. Could not find significance coverage in RS to verify notibility. Meatsgains (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. I'm also skeptical about some of the claims, which don't appear to be supported by even the weak sources given; thus, claims to notability aren't terribly credible (I'm the same user who requested speedy deletion). 2601:188:0:ABE6:AC71:F4C1:90A0:3793 (talk) 18:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The claim of "4 hit singles" is sourced to Amazon and iTunes, which only list items for sale, and make no comment on their status as a hit.[1] The claim of coverage by Hip Hop Weekly is sourced to the main web page of the magazine, not to any specific article, and a search on the site for 'Tripsane' shows no matches. In my mind, these were the only sources given that speak to notability, and they've both come up wanting. Willondon (talk) 21:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per MusikAnimal.Lacks reliable third party sources and fails WP:MUSICBIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:16, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW delete as there's hardly even much here to suggest at least minimal better notability and improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.