Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trivandrum V Balaji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 01:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trivandrum V Balaji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, searches come up with very little. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 14:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as I'm still not seeing anything actually confidently convincing of his own notability. SwisterTwister talk 00:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a simple Google search did not bring up anything, so it's clearly not notable enough for an encyclopedia. — Music1201 ^talk 21:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails GNG. Once again, what was the claim of notability? Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:49, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.