Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trivendra Singh
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:02, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Trivendra Singh
- Trivendra Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article does not have reliable sources, and contains some biased text. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Searches returns sources covering Trivendra Singh Rawat, a politician. theinstantmatrix (talk) 05:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:49, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete or userfy. Fails WP:NBIO right now, and the structure is very poor that if it is deemed notable it should be userfied in draft space. Not ready for public readership. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- keep Poor quality is not grounds for deletion. Nothing here supposes the subject is not notable.Egaoblai (talk) 08:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete There are passing mentions in 1,2 and 3, and though the subject appears to be significant in one category of table tennis, we have no no independent in-depth coverage to back it up. Further, This edit from another article (and the history of that user page) is indicative of the nominated article being an autobiography. MT TrainDiscuss 11:55, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.