Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trivial objections

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz talk 00:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial objections (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DePRODed. Concern was: Article has been marked as unsourced, as having original research, and as being written as a personal reflection for four years. No changes have been made. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Logic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trivial objections, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.