Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tula-Tu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Rose-Tu. (non-admin closure) Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tula-Tu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. It's a newborn, how cute, lots of attention, but no WP:SUSTAINED notability at the moment. I redirected it, but this was reverted, so AfD it is. Can be redirected together with Rose-Tu (same issues, at Prod now) to Oregon_Zoo#Elephants where they can get one or two sentences. Fram (talk) 14:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Tula-Tu and Rose-Tu to Oregon_Zoo#Elephants per nom. Run of the mill coverage of a zoo animal but no WP:SIGCOV. Wikipedia is not an index of zoo animals. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 17:39, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Oregon. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Rose-Tu, her mother, because while it might be toosoon for an article, this will preserve the history should she become more notable in the future. I've contested the PROD on her mother, due to academic sources (The Rediscovery of the Wild chapter 6 for starters), but there's plenty of work about her, due to the animal cruelty incident/legal issues/criminal charges & conviction which resulted in a decent about of coverage over a period of 10 years. Yes, the current version is a bit sparse, but it's missing a lot of life details. But anyways, not looking to turn this to an AfD on Rose-Tu. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:03, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No objection to a merge / redirect there, that was what I originally did as well. Fram (talk) 09:25, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge / redirect to Rose-tu per GreenLipstickLesbian. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:07, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Rose-Tu, the elephant's mother. jolielover♥talk 04:52, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect per above. I can't imagine a circumstance where a reader would be interested exclusively about one elephant and not the other. I believe the reader is better served by having info about both on the same page. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 23:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.