Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of 07:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tunc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources provided, nor do there seem to be any on the Internet. Quite possibly a hoax. Oneforfortytwo (talk) 23:00, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - While I'm almost positive the term isn't a hoax, I am unable to find any kind of RS to confirm. This is the only source I could find, which I wouldn't deem reliable by any means. Meatsgains (talk) 00:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I've found a few more uses of this online - here, here, here, here and here - most of which relate to the design of an Old Fashioned glass. None of these is especially reliable, but at least one or two are from glassware retailers. It's possible that this has been on Wikipedia so long that, like certain other words in the English language, it is now actually becoming used in the way described. --Rob linham (talk) 10:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 16:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunc, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.