Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turby wind turbine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 11:33, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Turby wind turbine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Exists, doesn't meet WP:N. Has been in CAT:NN for almost 12 years, hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 21:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. A google book search for Turby wind turbine turns up a lot of independent RS. Was a WP:BEFORE search done?4meter4 (talk) 01:34, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm getting rather tired of these nominations based purely on the length of time that an article has been in a category. That is a reason to check whether it belongs in the category, not to automatically nominate it for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I'm not sure if the Turby turbine is still being manufactured, looking at the Wayback Machine their website went offline earlier this year. However there are plenty of articles discussing the turbine. This article reads a bit too promotional for me, the benefits listed in it need removing or backed up by inline citations. This article criticises the Turby and other small turbines, but I'm not sure how reliable this source is. NemesisAT (talk) 18:59, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notable for the commercial use of a helical twist in the blades. RomanSpa (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.