Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turntable Timmy (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Michael Perry (author). (non-admin closure) ansh666 03:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- Turntable Timmy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK, search brings up nothing reliable. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. I'm bringing up some stuff via my college's database. There was a Remix mention, but I'm not sure if that's an article or an advert. I also brought up evidence of an article in Newsday, but I can't actually see the article since it isn't available for me. The article was "He Plies His Art by The Book Now" by Corey Takahashi and was in the 3/02/2003 issue of Newsday. Offhand I'd recommend redirecting this to the author's page, if I can't find anything else out there. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to author. The author's article has some issues with notability itself, but given that this isn't the topic of discussion there's no reason why this can't redirect. All I have at this point are four sources. The first, Boston Herald, is fairly brief and while there's a slight bit of a review this is more a list and not a review. The AWN link does announce the cartoon, but I can't find anything about it past then, meaning that it looks like this animated series never got off the ground. So no notability from that angle. The Remix source is dodgy for the above reason and the Newsday source would probably be usable except that I can't access it - if anyone can access and verify it, we could probably use it. However that really wouldn't be enough here to assert notability given how weak the others are, so I'd say redirecting is the best option here unless someone can bring up other sources. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.