Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tutorfair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tutorfair

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company. Promotional article. Few mentions in independent media - nothing that can be considered significant. Created by SPA/COI, has had little contribution from independent editors Rayman60 (talk) 02:25, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 03:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Accounts show it is a micro company, it appears they broker online school tutoring. Notability not established by refs. Szzuk (talk) 19:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The autumn 2013 references show passing mentions about the associated Tutorfair Foundation in coverage. They do also seem to have been commissioned as part of an EU CORDIS research project [1] but I am not seeing the substantial 3rd party coverage needed to demonstrate that this intermediary company has attained encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH, and in general, promo spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.