Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twennynine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:08, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Twennynine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not establish any notability for the band. JDDJS (talk) 02:42, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Due to aforesaid notability issues acknowledged and addressed as per edits and citations upon the article Twennynine. Given the band's albums and singles being prominent upon Billboard Magazine's Top R&B Albums, Hot R&B Songs and Dance Club Songs charts as is illustrated within the article. Woojy4 (talk • contribs) 04:52, 5

June 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Meets WP:MUSICBIO and the WP:GNG through charting records, album releases on major labels and non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. — sparklism ^hey! 09:47, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - No problems with notability as described by the other voters above. The nominator may have meant that the article needs to be cleaned up and to use references more informatively, which is indeed the case. Should be an easy cleanup if/when the article is kept. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:46, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.