Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twinbow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Essentially, nobody explicitly said they wanted to delete the article. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Twinbow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:NSONGS. Failed to chart or receive significant coverage from reliable sources. Hayman30 (talk) 11:05, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 13:08, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 13:08, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. It's been awarded a Pulitzer Prize and there are reliable sources that are independent from the topic and discuss the song significantly.. The editor whose username is Z0 13:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: uh, Z0, you do know that Pulitzer Prize article is a joke and it actually says "April Fools" at the bottom of it, right? Richard3120 (talk) 15:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • OMG! Nope, I didn't. That's so embarrassing! The editor whose username is Z0 15:57, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Wonderland in Rave is apparently a blog (frankly any website with the word "rave" in its name). Your EDM is borderline blog. Billboard's first article didn't go in-depth, and their second article is more of a remix announcement, definitely isn't significant coverage. Hayman30 (talk) 15:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I don't see anything special about this article, but as a marshmello fan, I want to expand this article but there's nothing more I can add here.

If this article should be kept, then redirects like You & Me and Love U should be expanded. --hueman1 (talk) 07:20, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• (new vote below) Delete per nom. The above links aren't significant coverage. wumbolo ^^^ 07:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Wumbolo, why do you say that? Dancing Astronaut and Billboard (magazine) are reliable sources and there's two articles by each that are wholly dedicated to this song. The editor whose username is Z0 08:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  There's also the passing of WP:NSONGS#3 as this song is independently covered and released by other notable artists in the form of remixes. The editor whose username is Z0 08:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Each of those sources discussed this song in only two sentences in total. Other parts of the articles are routine coverage. wumbolo ^^^ 08:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Wumbolo, that may be true but taking into consideration all the other mentioned sources above and more sources like [1][2][3], in addition to the chart positions and the fact this song was created by two notable artists and was covered by other notable artists, should indicate borderline notability. The editor whose username is Z0 08:47, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  That's better. I've changed my vote. wumbolo ^^^ 09:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. It is notable, and a merge would be inappropriate since this is a single by multiple notable artists. wumbolo ^^^ 09:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.