Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Faith (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:45, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Faith

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre; the prom controversy is significant. Mainstream appearances are minor.

Last AfD closed as "Keep" in 2009, but the arguments for retaining the article were not convincing. PORNBIO has been significantly tightened since then, so it's a good time to revisit. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:05, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:15, 30 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:17, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:17, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:17, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:17, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: concur with nominator, @CAPTAIN RAJU. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Quis separabit? 19:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and NHOTTIE. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 20:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 20:37, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The real issue is whether to redirect to the boxer she was reportedly engaged to, and that appears to ultimately be sourced to statements made on the Howard Stern show, typically rather unreliable. Plus, not even mentioned in the boxer's bio. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 19:58, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.