Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Typhoon Unding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn as there is a clear consensus to keep the set indexes. (non-admin closure) Noah^Talk 22:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Unding

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is covered by List of named storms (U–Z) and serves no purpose now Noah^Talk 22:08, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that I will be nominating more articles under this as I check them for coverage. They will be listed below as I add them. Noah^Talk 22:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If someone would like to simply redirect these, feel free to do so. I had a conversation with some other editors last night and agree that the best course of action is probably redirecting. As I haven't had time to do that, the AfD remains open. Noah^Talk 11:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:19, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. If the tropical storm project is no longer interested in these titles as set index articles, they should be turned into disambiguation pages to serve the purpose of reader navigation. Readers are better served by shorter lists that match the title sought. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's much easier to find which storm you are looking for when there are only a few options rather than a long list. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a dab page (i.e. fix per mosdab if necessary) - or as a minimum as a redirect to an anchor in a list. DexDor^(talk) 19:15, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as these pages aid navigation in their current form. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 19:18, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all, and perhaps nominate List of named storms (U–Z) for deletion, given there is no lists for other sections alphabetically. Ajf773 (talk) 09:34, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @JHunterJ, Tavix, DexDor, and Rubbish computer: As I said above, I discussed and agreed deletion would not be the best option after the fact that the AfD had started. Would it be okay to have all those links redirect to their specific storm name on the alphabetical list? @Ajf773: Just because nothing similar exists at this time, doesn't mean you can delete it. Nothing new would be created if that were the case. Noah^Talk 13:08, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, per what I said above. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. DexDor^(talk) 20:29, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The alternative to removing that list is to create more to cover the full scope alphabetically. Ajf773 (talk) 22:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.