Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UAS International Trip Support
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲水 07:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
UAS International Trip Support
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- UAS International Trip Support (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP as all none of the sources are independent or reliable. The sources on the page, and in a deeper google/database search almost exclusively come from AIN Online which are all press release copypasta from the UAS press room [1]. Take for example this AIN story about UAS in China [2] which comes directly from this UAS press release [3] Theredproject (talk) 13:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 13:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 13:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Logs:
2015-11 move to→ Draft:UAS International Trip Support
,2015-04✗ A7
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom, the vast majority of the references are reprints of press releases, or just the press releases themselves, and therefore primary sources. What what other coverage there is does not provide SIGCOV. As a result this fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with the above. I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 20:27, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.