Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UAV Navigation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UAV Navigation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of what is available is non in-depth coverage or from publications that aren't reliable. Fails WP:NCORP. ABHammad (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ABHammad (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Spain. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aoidh (talk) 01:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sourcing is press-releases, I'm not showing much else. Oaktree b (talk) 01:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agreed with the above, non in-depth coverage or from publications that aren't reliable. Fails WP:NCORP. Timtime88 (talk) 10:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't remember the last time I saw so many 404 errors at sources. And the other ones are mostly primary, unfortunately. Suitskvarts (talk) 15:22, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.