Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFM100.3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 13:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UFM100.3

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No reliable sources cited. Current version of article copied from a mirror of an older version <https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/UFM_1003.html>. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 19:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Singapore. Shellwood (talk) 19:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A quick search comes up with multiple sources, such as this, this and this, and this shows even more.Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 04:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also see 96.3 Hao FM, which was restored by the same user. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:06, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:GNG and WP:BCAST with sources presented by Somebodyidkfkdt. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 01:15, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not going to weigh in but please also discuss the entire set of SPH radio articles which are in dispute here: Talk:SPH Media Trust. Thanks. Also pinging @Justlettersandnumbers: and @TheGreatSG'rean: to bring this to the attention of relevant people.--Officer781 (talk) 15:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.