Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:51, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UFO2

UFO2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not appear to meet WP:NALBUM. Dolotta (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I see now what is happening now. I just created the page because I have all info handy, but I'm also the artist, and that's a conflict of interest. No worries. Joelkanning

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 04:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Non-notable --Jennica / talk 01:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Non-notable & clearly promotional. I'd argue that the Joel Kanning, Ubiquitous Frequency Oscillation (UFO), and Nobis (album) articles should also all be deleted, as Kanning himself doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG and neither do any of his self released albums. (Not to mention all those pages being created at the same time by a single use account, so likely WP:PROMO.) JamesG5 (talk) 06:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO2, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.