Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNETSHA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UNETSHA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and "UNETSHA" at Books, News, Google browser and Highbeam found some links but not much and nothing recently with the listed website now closed apparently so this may have gotten much attention and not exist at all anymore. SwisterTwister talk 06:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The product still exists [1] but I am finding nothing beyond a couple of press release notices of an agreement with Ricoh in 2008. Fails WP:NSOFT, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 16:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up press releases but no significant WP:RS coverage. It is possible there is Korean language sourcing, as it appears the software originates from Korea. Dialectric (talk) 12:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT lacks third party reliable sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not covered by reliable sources. --Reinoutr (talk) 08:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.