Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uba Danzainab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uba Danzainab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NPOL. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:IS WP:RS containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. Some routine mill coverage exists and mentions in other articles that fall under WP:NOTINHERITED. BLP articles should strictly follow WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements.   // Timothy :: talk  01:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  01:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  01:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I can’t see any indication of notability. Mccapra (talk) 08:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no actual indication of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as they do not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — Per rationale by nom, I do not believe WP:NPOL is satisfied. Celestina007 (talk) 23:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.