Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulmo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vala (Middle-earth)#Ulmo. There was consensus that this shouldn't have a stand-alone article. If found necessary, more material can be merged via the page history. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ulmo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG/NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT. Suggest soft delete by redirecting to Vala_(Middle-earth)#Ulmo. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with "the Valar are significant in Tolkien's work" which would be an invalid argument even if we were AfDing Valars, which we are not. This is about an individual one, which like all the others, is not likely to be notable enough for a stand-alone article _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:41, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge to Vala (Middle-earth)#Ulmo. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete his role is not at all important within the actual source material. There just is not enough sourcing to justify notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG/NFICTION. Necrothesp's arguement is invalid. Kacper IV (talk) 12:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.