Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UltraFly Model Corporation (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UltraFly Model Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was over 13 years ago. Could not find any coverage in English. Would reconsider if someone found indepth Chinese sources. LibStar (talk) 04:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Taiwan. AllyD (talk) 05:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete promotional for a dead business. No coverage. Walt Yoder (talk) 17:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: interviews (ref 1) can sometimes be reliable/notable, but not in this case with so few sources. The second ref is WP:LINKEDIN. Asparagusus (interaction) 13:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: An article setting out the former product proposition of a company, supported by an interview and a shopping site EL. No evidence of attained notability provided or found. AllyD (talk) 08:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.