Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultrawave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ansible. Daniel (talk) 04:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ultrawave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced plot summary in the poor WP:IPC-violating style (list of media that mention the term ultrawave). The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Declined PROD. Per short discussion on talk, a redirect to Ansible seems like the best WP:PRESERVE option (ping User:TompaDompa), but since the prod decliner (User:Explicit) asked for WP:AFD, here we go. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultrawave, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.