Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:44, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Umart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've declined a speedy on this article mainly because of its age. However, in the 10 pages of ghits I've looked at, I saw was nothing I would consider a reliable independent source. (I did find an insolvency report, but wouldn't consider that of worth.) The references given are a Bloomberg profile, the company site, and a report of an armed raid on one of their shops. Peridon (talk) 12:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I thought the PC User magazine entry might actually be an article, but it's just a forum thread that lists Umart as one of many nominated websites. 157.235.66.80 (talk) 15:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORG aren't met Nick-D (talk) 22:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.