Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish its WP:NOTABILITY. If deleted, Unar (disambiguation) should be moved to this page. Boleyn (talk) 15:40, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• For what it's worth, as the article creator of record, I am agnostic to its existence. It was created to replace a copyright problem. The source that confirmed the tribe's notability (such as it was even then) checked out as unverifiable by User:Sitush in 2014. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- an unreferenced one-line essay; as at similar AfDs the existence of this subject is dubious. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:18, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No evidence that this "clan" exists. And yes, Unar (disambiguation) should be moved to Unar after deleting the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.