Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Under Giant Trees

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator‎. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Under Giant Trees

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2015. Fails to meet WP:NALBUM as no WP:SIGCOV exists that I can find. A couple blog posts about it but not enough to prove notability. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 15:23, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 15:23, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator: Sufficient sourcing exists for notability. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 17:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Found three reviews ([1][2][3]) and two book excerpts discussing the graphic design of the record's packaging ([4][5]). With all that, it'd be a short article but not a non-notable one. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:48, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to have been proven wrong! I will have to add archive.org to my WP:BEFORE regimen. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 17:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per the sources provided above. FlutterDash344 (talk) 21:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.