Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicode/Versions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode/Versions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NOTCHANGELOG. This was copied into mainspace from a draft, complete with AfC comments and tags. Author has repeatedly recreated/moved this page under different names, so there might be some satellite messes to clean up (judging from their contributions). JoelleJay (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Technology, and Software. JoelleJay (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Beyond clear violation of WP:NOTCHANGELOG BrigadierG (talk) 00:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Definitely covered by WP:NOTCHANGELOG Mason (talk) 01:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Clear cut violation of WP:NOTCHANGELOG Steven Walling • talk 00:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Just a clear violation of WP:NOTCHANGELOG. FlutterDash344 (talk) 01:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Nothing has changed since I declined it citing Wikipedia is not a changelog, except that the originator is continuing to be tendentious. It still violates Wikipedia is not a changelog. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fall under WP:NOT. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 07:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I could see how some kind of sourced and prose-based history of the development of Unicode could plausibly be encyclopedic. This is not that. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Interesting information for sure, but Wikipedia is not a changelog per above, although this is snow at this point. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: more AfC-dodging from this user; I previously draftified the exact same content. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.