Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unique World Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unique World Records

Unique World Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. No media coverage. Gpkp [utc] 16:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 19:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - does not meet WP:NBOOK, has not been "the subject of two or more non-trivial published works", has not "won a major literary award", etc. - also, as the publisher is Unique World Records Limited, it counts as a self-published work - Epinoia (talk) 21:11, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unique World Records, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.